The Trump Presidency Timeline

A federal judge had to step in and issue a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump administration from removing a 5-year-old boy and his father after ICE scooped them up in Minnesota and quietly shipped them to Texas. Because nothing says "law and order" like grabbing a kid after preschool and flying him a thousand miles away to a detention center in Dilley.

The Department of Homeland Security insists they weren’t targeting little Liam Conejo Ramos, they were just coincidentally arresting his dad right after preschool drop-off, then moving both of them across the country. Critics say ICE is using kids as "bait"; DHS says, actually, this is fine and "consistent with past administrations," which is a hell of a defense: we’ve always been awful, your honor.

The family’s lawyer points out they did everything by the book: entered in 2023 using the CBP One app, showed up for court, followed every protocol, posed no flight risk—and still got detained. Then Trump killed the app last year, because why have an orderly, legal process when you can have chaos and child detention instead? Meanwhile, a school board chair on the scene says there were multiple safe adults ready to take the child, but ICE somehow chose the "drag him to Texas" option on the menu.

For now, the judge has barred ICE from removing or transferring the father and son outside the Western District of Texas. In other words, the only thing standing between a 5-year-old and Trump’s deportation machine is a federal court order. But sure, tell us more about how this is all about "border security" and not a deliberate policy of terrorizing immigrant families.

The Trump administration’s latest innovation in law-and-order cosplay is now getting its day in court: the families of two Trinidadian men killed in an October U.S. strike on a small boat are suing for wrongful death and extrajudicial killing. The Pentagon called it a hit on a drug-smuggling vessel full of “narcoterrorists.” The families say Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo were fishermen and farm workers just trying to get home. The government’s evidence so far: Trump posted on Truth Social that they were bad guys. In other words, the usual rigorous intel vetting process.

This is the first lawsuit targeting Trump’s shiny new campaign of blowing up alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific — a campaign that has already hit about three dozen vessels and killed at least 125 people, according to the Defense Department. The administration’s legal theory is that the U.S. is in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels, which is a very fancy way of saying, “We wanted to use bombs instead of indictments.” The lawsuit points out the tiny problem that there is no actual armed conflict here, meaning the laws of war don’t apply and these are just… murders. Ordered, the complaint notes, by “individuals at the highest levels of government,” because nothing says limited government like claiming war powers against fishermen.

Trinidad’s own government says it has no information linking Joseph or Samaroo to any illegal activity, and no evidence anyone on the boat had drugs or weapons. But the U.S. didn’t bother notifying the families, because why add basic human decency to your extrajudicial killing program? Instead, their loved ones just stopped calling one day and never came home, while Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth bragged that six “narcoterrorists” had been successfully obliterated. The families are suing under the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statute — quaint little relics that say you’re not supposed to vaporize foreign civilians on the ocean because the president got bored of sanctions.

The complaint calls the strike “simply murders,” and it’s hard to argue with that when your big legal move is to rebrand drug interdiction as a forever war and let the Commander-in-Chief play drone whack-a-mole with boats in the Caribbean. But sure, tell us again how this administration is the last line of defense against tyranny, as it literally claims global war powers to kill unarmed fishermen without charges, evidence, or notice to their families. Rule of law, Trump-style: if the president tweets you’re a narcoterrorist, you’re a legitimate target; if he’s wrong, your survivors can file some paperwork after the funeral and hope a judge still remembers what the Constitution is.

The United States has officially left the Paris climate agreement for the second time, because when Donald Trump finds the self-destruct button for the planet, he really likes to slam it twice just to be sure. The US now joins the climate non-party VIP lounge with Iran, Libya, and Yemen, but stands alone as the only country that actually walked away from the deal on purpose. In other words, the world’s richest country just told everyone drowning, burning, or starving, “good luck with that,” and went back to chanting “drill, baby, drill” at a stadium rally.

This isn’t just leaving Paris; the administration is also bailing on the entire UN climate framework, amounting to a full-on retreat from climate governance while the planet sets new heat records like it’s trying to win a prize. Experts warn this “we will be the bad guys” energy gives fossil fuel lobbyists in China and elsewhere a handy excuse to slow-walk the energy transition, while low-income countries are told that the US won’t fund their transition away from fossil fuels at all. Because nothing says global leadership like telling the global south, “we caused most of the problem, but you’re on your own.”

Meanwhile, renewables are now the cheapest new power almost everywhere, China dominates clean energy supply chains, and the US is choosing to be the guy in the corner burning coal to power AI data centers that will, presumably, generate even more climate denial memes. As one expert notes, it’s not clear America even has any credibility left to lose, but Trump is out here stress-testing that theory anyway. Pulling out of the key global climate agreement right as every scientific report says things are worse than we thought is less “policy” and more “suicidal performance art” — but sure, tell us again how this is all about sovereignty and freedom.

Alex Vindman — the guy who politely told Congress that Trump was trying to extort Ukraine like a mob boss with nuclear codes — is now running for Senate in Florida. His launch video helpfully reminds voters that the last time they saw him, he was under oath explaining how the president tried to shake down Volodymyr Zelenskyy for dirt on the Bidens and 2016, and then got his career kneecapped for the crime of telling the truth. In other words, he’s running on the radical platform of "maybe presidents shouldn’t run personal blackmail operations through U.S. foreign policy."

Vindman, a Ukrainian-born Army vet and retired lieutenant colonel, points out that Trump responded to his testimony with a classic authoritarian move: retaliation. Trump blocked his promotion, had him and his twin brother Eugene booted from the National Security Council, and generally treated the federal government like his own personal HR department for vengeance. Vindman now describes that period as a "reign of terror and retribution" — because nothing says "totally normal democratic administration" like purging national security officials for insufficient loyalty to the dear leader.

He’s aiming at GOP Sen. Ashley Moody, the former Florida attorney general who was magically elevated to the Senate after Marco Rubio abandoned legislating to go be Trump’s secretary of state. Moody’s job description is pretty simple: be a "yes" vote for Trump and the billionaires, which Vindman sums up neatly as, "She’s not Florida’s senator. She’s theirs." Meanwhile, Florida Democrats are trying to win a statewide race in a state Trump carried by 13 points and Rubio by 16, so this is basically a boss-level attempt to unseat a handpicked loyalist in the middle of Trump’s second-term chaos of thug militias, tariff-driven price hikes, and health care costs exploding.

The Democratic primary is crowded with other hopefuls, but Vindman is leaning hard into the contrast: one guy tried to stop a corrupt president from hijacking U.S. foreign policy for personal gain, got purged for it, and is now running to check that same regime from the Senate. The other proudly votes yes on whatever the Mar-a-Lago Politburo and its billionaire backers slide across her desk. But sure, tell us more about how the real threat to democracy is people being mean to Trump on the internet.

The Treasury Department has heroically canceled $21 million in Booz Allen Hamilton contracts after a contractor leaked IRS data showing how the ultra-wealthy — including Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Jeff Bezos — pay little or nothing in taxes. Because nothing says "restoring trust in government" like making sure no one ever again finds out how thoroughly the tax code has been engineered to kiss the ring of the billionaire class.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent tore up 31 contracts and declared this an "essential step" to rebuilding confidence, which is an interesting way of saying: we can’t have the peasants seeing the receipts. The leaker, Booz Allen contractor Charles Edward Littlejohn, already got five years in prison for exposing how the richest people on earth treat the IRS like a suggestion box, but apparently that wasn’t enough punishment for the crime of publicly humiliating Trump and his fellow tax contortionists.

Booz Allen, for its part, insists it’s shocked — shocked! — by Treasury’s decision, stressing that the leaks happened on government systems, not theirs, and that they helpfully assisted in the investigation that put Littlejohn behind bars. In other words: they’re very committed to ethics, as long as those ethics begin and end with protecting the confidentiality of billionaires’ shell games, not the public’s right to know that the system is a joke.

So the message is clear: if you’re a billionaire, the government will bend over backwards to safeguard your privacy as you legally acrobat your way out of paying taxes. If you expose that rigged circus? Enjoy prison, canceled contracts, and a federal government that treats transparency like the real crime.

Lindsey Halligan, a Trump loyalist who wandered into the Justice Department from the glamorous world of insurance law, is now officially not employed by DOJ after a federal judge said she had to stop “masquerading” as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Halligan, who had exactly zero prosecutorial experience, nonetheless managed to pose as the top federal prosecutor while pursuing two failed cases against Trump’s perceived enemies, because nothing says independent law enforcement like sending the president’s personal lawyer to go settle scores.

Judge David Novak — a Trump appointee, just to really underline how bad this was — found she was unlawfully holding the role and politely suggested she stop LARPing as a U.S. Attorney. He declined to refer her for disciplinary proceedings, generously blaming it on her “inexperience” rather than the obvious problem: a Justice Department being run like Trump’s personal Patreon perk. Halligan now joins fellow Trump fixer Alina Habba, who was also disqualified as an acting U.S. Attorney in New Jersey but somehow managed to cling to a DOJ job afterward, as part of the growing alumni network of Make Prosecutorial Misconduct Great Again.

In other words, Trump’s DOJ staffing strategy remains consistent: don’t pick seasoned prosecutors who know the law; pick personal loyalists who know him, shove them into top jobs they’re not qualified for, and then act shocked when courts notice that the nation’s premier law enforcement agency is being run like a third-tier revenge law firm with government letterhead. But sure, we’re told, the real threat to the rule of law is career civil servants and law professors posting mean things on the internet.

On a secretly recorded donor call, Ted Cruz helpfully confirmed what everyone already suspected: when confronted with basic political reality, Donald Trump’s presidential instinct is to scream “fuck you, Ted” and hang up. Cruz says he warned Trump in 2025 that his shiny new round of sweeping tariffs might turn the 2026 midterms into an economic “bloodbath” if 401(k)s tanked and prices kept climbing. In other words, the GOP’s big concern about Trump’s trade policy isn’t that it wrecks people’s lives — it’s that it might wreck their House majority.

Cruz reportedly told Trump that if voters hit election day with retirement accounts down 30% and grocery prices up 10–20%, Republicans would lose the House, lose the Senate, and Trump would spend “the next two years being impeached every single week.” Trump, noted master dealmaker and stable genius, responded by yelling and cursing at multiple GOP senators, because nothing says “serious steward of the economy” like throwing a profanity-laced fit when someone explains how math and inflation work.

The public, rudely failing to appreciate this 4D chess, currently gives Trump a 34% approval rating on the cost of living, with 64% disapproving — a fun number if you’re into watching your own coalition peel away in real time. Meanwhile, Cruz used the same recording to torch Vice-President JD Vance as Tucker Carlson’s puppet, accusing the Vance–Tucker tag team of ousting national security adviser Mike Waltz for wanting to bomb Iran. So the party of law and order now features a president running an economy into the ground with tariffs, a veep allegedly installed by a TV demagogue, and a senator live-commentating the implosion on hidden tape. But sure, tell us more about how this is all going according to plan.

Trump’s second-term immigration brain trust has apparently decided that if you can’t legally deport people back to countries that might kill them, you just outsource the problem. Enter Costa Rica, one of several Central American countries strong-armed into taking plane-loads of asylum seekers the US refused to even let ask for asylum. These people — including 81 children — were flown in chains on deportation flights despite not being criminals, because nothing says "land of the free" like shackling desperate families and dumping them in countries they’ve never set foot in.

Among them: a Russian family who fled after the husband documented election irregularities in Putin’s happy fun democracy and tried to get the evidence to Navalny’s network. They did the “legal” thing under Biden’s system, got a CBPOne appointment, and then watched Trump stroll back into the White House and, within hours of inauguration, nuke the entire asylum process and cancel their slot. When they turned themselves in at the border anyway and requested asylum — that thing protected by both US and international law — they were handcuffed in front of their child, locked in Otay Mesa for a month, then loaded onto a military plane and secretly shipped to Costa Rica.

Once there, this supposed “safe haven” locked them in a migrant detention center for two months, prompting Human Rights Watch to call it “reprehensible.” The family didn’t even know where Costa Rica was on a map, but Trump knew it was far enough away that Americans wouldn’t see what was being done in their name. In other words: the US government grabbed a political dissident fleeing an authoritarian regime, denied him the right to request asylum, chained his family up, and disappeared them into a third country where they’re still in legal limbo — and we’re all supposed to pretend this is just "border security" and not a dress rehearsal for how you treat dissidents once you’re done with the immigrants.