The Trump Presidency Timeline

Marco Rubio, now secretary of state and apparently also secretary of no consequences ever, has launched a full-blown campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court because it might one day inconvenience US soldiers, Border Patrol agents, or the occasional allied prime minister accused of bombing civilians. He’s out here warning that American officials could be “dragged before an international court” by scary foreign judges whose radical agenda includes such extremist concepts as "don’t commit war crimes in other people’s countries."

The State Department plan is as subtle as a Trump tweet: pressure countries to abandon the ICC or face US sanctions, travel bans, and visa revocations. So if your government wants US aid, you’re expected to help kneecap the only court on Earth that can prosecute atrocities when local systems won’t. As Kenneth Roth helpfully notes, Rubio is just slapping a "sovereignty" sticker on what is transparently a quest for blanket impunity for American and allied war crimes. Minor detail: the ICC doesn’t even claim jurisdiction over crimes committed inside the US.

The Trump-Rubio axis has already sanctioned the ICC prosecutor, his deputies, six judges, a UN special rapporteur, and three Palestinian human rights groups for the high crime of documenting possible Israeli and US war crimes. Now they’re floating sanctions on the entire tribunal, which would make it illegal for Americans, banks, and companies to work with the court at all. According to human rights advocates, this isn’t just hypocrisy; it may itself amount to obstruction of justice under the Rome Statute. So yes, the administration’s strategy for avoiding war-crimes charges is to commit more crimes against the system that prosecutes war crimes. Bold.

Rubio insists he’s saving the “rules-based international order” by smashing the only institution that occasionally enforces any rules on powerful countries. As one advocate put it, he’s not dismantling the ICC brick by brick so much as kicking over what was left of the post–World War II legal order to make sure that from Ukraine to Sudan to Palestine, anyone with enough firepower and a Washington lobbyist can go back to the simpler era where the only real international law was "who’s going to stop us?"

Donald Trump, America’s leading experiment in what happens when you mix reality TV with nuclear codes, has recommended that South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster appoint Lindsey Graham’s sister, Darline Graham Nordone, to finish Graham’s Senate term. He announced this on Truth Social, because of course he did, calling it a “fabulous tribute” – which is one way of describing the idea that U.S. Senate seats are now sentimental family heirlooms to be passed down like grandma’s china.

McMaster is holding a press conference to announce his pick, while his spokesperson pretends this isn’t just a public audition for who can flatter Trump the hardest. Sen. Tim Scott quickly endorsed the idea, praising Graham’s sister as the perfect choice because she understands Lindsey’s love of family, South Carolina, and country – a criteria list that conspicuously skips literally anything about qualifications for the job. The state’s political class is already circling the open seat like vultures at a donor retreat, but Trump has made it clear he’d really like to see a short-term test run of the “American political dynasties, but make it MAGA” model.

Under South Carolina law, whoever gets appointed will only hold the seat until January, when voters pick a permanent replacement in a special election. So this isn’t so much representation as a six-month cosplay of hereditary rule. Between Trump’s public pressure, the GOP’s reflexive eagerness to comply, and the casual assumption that a Senate seat is a family memento to be lovingly displayed in the Capitol, the line between a republic and a small-town fiefdom keeps getting blurrier.

The Supreme Court, in a 5–4 decision in Trump v. Barbara, grudgingly remembered the 14th Amendment exists and upheld birthright citizenship, which unfortunately ruined Stephen Miller’s dream of turning the U.S. into a whites-only HOA with nukes. Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14160 tried to strip citizenship from kids born here if their parents were undocumented or on temporary visas; the majority opinions shredded that idea without once naming Miller, which is like doing Dracula and forgetting the guy with the cape and the blood fetish.

Chief Justice Roberts called the old Dred Scott logic “odious,” while Justice Jackson calmly pointed out that the Trump administration, plus Thomas and Alito, are basically auditioning to bring back Taney’s bloodline-based citizenship. She notes that the Fourteenth Amendment was sort of designed to stop exactly this “citizenship by racial purity” nonsense, which you’d think would be obvious to people who allegedly read the Constitution for fun.

Miller, furious that the Court declined to resurrect 19th-century white supremacy as national policy, ran to X to declare the ruling “one of the most destructive and outrageous decisions” in Court history and ranted that American citizenship “belongs only and solely to Americans,” which is a neat little tautology for people who think law is just vibes. On Fox News, he upgraded to full ethnonationalist word salad, sneering at “third world nations” that supposedly “would have never invented the wheel,” helpfully advertising that if he had to take a naturalization civics test he’d wash out before the first multiple choice question.

Behind the scenes, Miller has spent years trying to swap out a constitutional, law-based idea of American identity for a genetic one—pushing mass deportations, weaponized ICE, bogus claims of mass illegal voting, and the “Save Act,” a proof-of-citizenship scheme that functions like a poll tax with extra paperwork. All this while the Trump administration drives out tens of thousands of scientists and slashes research grants, even as immigrants found the majority of billion-dollar startups, lead AI innovation, staff hospitals, and do most of the actual “modern technology” work Miller insists they’re incapable of. So yes, the people building America’s future are immigrants; the guy trying to revoke their kids’ citizenship is just building a very loud, very stupid shrine to blood and soil.

At the University of North Texas, an exhibit by Victor "Marka27" Quiñonez lasted about as long as due process at an ICE check-in. His show, Ni De Aquí, Ni De Allá — Neither from Here Nor from There, featured giant Mexican paleta sculptures with handcuffs, replica guns, rosaries, and popsicle sticks stamped with a parody ICE logo reading: "U.S. Inhumane and Cruelty Enforcement". You know, a factual statement.

The exhibit had already run peacefully at Boston University, but once it hit Texas, it apparently triggered the state’s Standing Your Ground Against Metaphor statute. Within days, students started pinging the artist: the show was suddenly shut down, works quietly removed, and administrators started speaking fluent Bureaucratic Passive Voice about "concerns" and "procedures." Translation: you can enroll, pay tuition, and live with the consequences of immigration policy — you just can’t visually criticize the people enforcing it.

So on a campus where a quarter of the students are Hispanic, an artist who literally grew up in East Dallas was told, effectively, that his experience of U.S. immigration enforcement is too spicy for the gallery walls. The message from the state that worships "free speech": by all means, celebrate tacos and folklórico — but the minute you mention cages, handcuffs, or the agency doing the caging, the First Amendment gets deported.

Lindsey Graham, who spent the last decade as the Senate’s most accomplished political weather vane, has died at 71 after what his office calls a sudden illness. The retired air force reserve JAG, famous for loving every war he met and wanting to meet several more, went from calling Trump a "race-baiting, xenophobic bigot" in 2016 to becoming one of his loudest hype men once the base made it clear they preferred the bigot over the hawk.

Washington reporters are already workshopping solemn tributes about his "independence" and "bipartisanship", carefully skipping the part where he helped launder Trump’s authoritarian impulses through the Senate, defended every new executive power grab, and treated constitutional checks like a suggestion box. The GOP, meanwhile, loses a reliable vote for forever war abroad and judicial extremism at home – and Trump loses one of his most practiced cable-news defense attorneys.

His death leaves an open Senate seat in South Carolina and a temporary vacuum in the "I used to have principles, then I met Donald" caucus. Expect a brisk primary among aspiring mini-Grahams, all eager to prove they, too, can go from calling Trump unfit for office to swearing eternal loyalty the moment it looks politically useful. The legacy of enabling doesn’t die; it just waits for the next host.

The Trump administration has apparently decided that if you can’t secure Air Force One, you can at least try to secure the narrative. After New York Times reporters revealed that Trump’s shiny new $400m Qatar-gifted presidential jet might be missing basic antimissile protections, the Justice Department helpfully showed up at their homes with grand jury subpoenas. Because nothing says “state-of-the-art security” like sending federal agents to intimidate the people who noticed you forgot the flares.

Press freedom groups are, shockingly, not thrilled that federal prosecutors are dragging journalists toward a secret grand jury for the crime of reporting on whether the president’s foreign-donated plane is a flying bullseye. Times lawyer David McCraw called the doorstep visits from federal agents an assault on the Constitution, which is generous, since this White House mostly treats the First Amendment like a suggestion box it can set on fire.

The White House insists the new Air Force One is totally safe and “state-of-the-art,” while also bragging that they use “distraction and misdirection” as security tools — which is one way to describe subpoenaing reporters who expose your security gaps. This comes on the heels of Trump’s team trying (and in other cases temporarily succeeding) to subpoena journalists at the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, prosecuting Don Lemon and other journalists for covering a protest, and greenlighting an FBI raid on a Post reporter’s home. The message is clear: the press is free to report anything it wants, as long as it’s flattering, pre-cleared, and doesn’t question the presidential warplane gifted by a friendly petro-monarchy.

The Trump administration has apparently decided that outright banning science is too on-the-nose, so they’re going with the more elegant solution: make doing research so suffocatingly bureaucratic that scientists simply walk away. The Office of Management and Budget’s new proposed rules would let political appointees rummage through federal grants, vetoing anything that doesn’t sufficiently flatter the president’s policy whims, while hunting for forbidden words like “disparity” and “marginalized” as if epidemiology were a woke slur. Peer review by scientists? Downgraded. Oversight by hacks? Upgraded.

To really spice things up, the rules also aim to kneecap international collaboration, especially with places like China, because nothing says “serious cancer research” like banning your best possible collaborators. At the same time, NIH funding is frozen or erratic enough that junior scientists are being nudged out of the field or out of the country. It’s a slow-motion brain drain, except the drain is being dug on purpose.

And while they’re starving basic research, the National Science Foundation is allegedly slashing core science programs to shovel $1.5 billion into something called “X-Labs,” which appears to be: what if we just gave the money to private tech companies instead? So public science gets defunded, private firms get taxpayer cash, and research priorities quietly shift from public health and long-term knowledge to whatever makes shareholders happiest this quarter. It’s the public transit privatization scam, but for the entire scientific enterprise.

The plan is simple: make public science chaotic, underfunded, and politically policed, then point at the wreckage and announce that the market will save us. Scientists and the public are being begged to file comments against the OMB rules before the deadline, because apparently the only thing standing between US science and death by a thousand bureaucratic shivs is how many people can navigate regulations.gov in time.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz just looked at Trump’s year-long National Guard occupation of Washington, D.C., saw his troops wandering around far from the monuments on "presence patrols" in residential neighborhoods, and said: absolutely not, send them home. Walz had deployed the Guard for America 250 events near the Mall, not to help staff Trump’s rolling experiment in how much military presence you can cram into a city before someone says the word authoritarian out loud on cable news.

This patriotic set piece is branded as a federal Joint Task Force to fight crime and "beautify" D.C., despite crime already trending down. The number of troops has now doubled to more than 5,100 for a so-called "summer surge," burning through over $3 million a day so the president can cosplay urban strongman while calling it law and order. Constitutional scholars and activists are pointing out that turning the capital into a semi-permanent armed camp is not exactly what the Founders had in mind, unless there’s a lost Federalist Paper titled, "On the Importance of Random Humvees Outside Your Apartment."

Democratic governors from Kentucky, North Carolina, Michigan, Maryland, and Hawaii tried to thread the world’s dumbest needle by sending their own Guard units only for the anniversary celebrations, loudly insisting they’re not part of Trump’s policing mission. The D.C. Joint Task Force then helpfully listed them on its website anyway, all duly deputized as special police by the U.S. Marshals Service and issued firearms. So the official line is: they’re not doing law enforcement, they’re just law-enforcement-deputized troops with guns on patrol in your neighborhood. Relax, citizen.

Walz yanking his troops early is the first visible crack in the blue-state participation in Trump’s capital-city security theater. Meanwhile, Michigan’s Democratic governor is now under growing pressure to stop loaning out her Guard as extras in this very expensive, deeply unconstitutional live-action remake of "Democracy, But Make It Martial."