The Trump Presidency Timeline

The Trump administration heard the public outcry over ripping kids from their parents at the border and, in a bold new innovation in cruelty, decided the fix was to just lock them up together. Welcome back to Dilley, Texas, a family detention center so humane it features a measles outbreak, reports of no clean drinking water, and a five-year-old asylum seeker in a Spider-Man backpack becoming the country’s newest symbol of state-sponsored child abuse. Since Trump returned to office, the daily number of kids in ICE detention has jumped sixfold, because nothing says "family values" like expanding the baby prison sector.

Local organizers and faith groups are literally standing outside the fence screaming so the kids inside know they’re not forgotten, while CoreCivic – the private prison company cashing the checks – assures us that everything is fine and the health and safety of detainees is their "top priority." Fun fact: their top priority also appears on the NYSE. ICE, naturally, declined to comment, presumably too busy planning how to spend the $38bn DHS wants to blow on buying warehouses and converting them into even more detention centers. Why invest in schools when you can build climate-controlled trauma factories?

Meanwhile, a growing national coalition is pointing out that all of this horror is perfectly legal because Congress hasn’t bothered to outlaw jailing entire families. Advocates call it what it is – "state-sponsored child abuse" – while public opinion finally starts to notice that maybe ICE has "gone too far" when it’s arresting kindergartners in bunny hats. A few states like New Mexico and Illinois are trying to slam the door on ICE detention and private lockups, and local developers are backing out of detention deals under public pressure. The administration’s response so far: double down on the warehouse gulag strategy and hope Americans get bored of watching children beg for "libertad" from behind barbed wire.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Mar-a-Lago HOA’s favorite federal employee — has now formally declared that the American public is not allowed to see what former Special Counsel Jack Smith dug up about Donald Trump hoarding classified documents in his country club bathroom. Cannon blocked the release of Smith’s report, arguing it can’t leave the Justice Department because, according to her, Smith’s appointment was unlawful and the AG’s internal deliberations are just too delicate for democracy.

Recall that Cannon already tossed the entire classified documents case in 2024 by deciding that the special counsel role suddenly violated the Constitution once it inconvenienced the guy who gave her the robe. An appeals court had previously smacked her down for “improperly” grabbing jurisdiction in the Mar-a-Lago search, but she’s back at it, now using a protective order to keep discovery materials — and the report built on them — locked away from both the public and Congress. Transparency is for losers; Trump gets judicial non-disclosure agreements.

Smith told lawmakers in a closed-door session that his team had “powerful evidence” Trump willfully kept highly classified documents after leaving office, stashing them among the golf tees and wedding centerpieces, and then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice when the FBI came calling. So naturally, Cannon ruled that it’s “not customary” to release a report with all that evidence after a case is dismissed — a dismissal she engineered by declaring the prosecutor himself illegitimate. It’s a neat little circle: Trump gets his judge, the judge kills the case, then uses the dead body as proof that no autopsy is allowed.

For extra protection, Cannon had already barred DOJ from even sending the report to select members of Congress in January 2025, just as Trump was sliding back into the Oval Office. The result: a sitting president accused of willfully retaining classified documents and obstructing justice, shielded from public scrutiny by a judge whose opinions are “extraordinarily deferential” to him. Checks and balances have been replaced by one simple standard: if it hurts Trump, it’s unconstitutional.

Trump’s second-term FBI purge is apparently the gift that keeps on giving. David Sundberg, the former head of the FBI’s Washington field office who was dumped just days after Trump retook office, is now running for Congress in Maryland. His alleged crime? Doing his job and not letting MAGA politics rewrite federal investigations like they’re Truth Social posts.

Sundberg’s platform is basically: remember the Constitution? He says he was forced out for refusing to let politics corrupt justice, and now he’s running because he believes in the rule of law, not the rule of one man. Bold concept in 2026. He’s also calling out the White House for weaponizing the DOJ to go after Trump’s enemies list — James Comey, Letitia James, John Bolton — while using the National Guard as a domestic intimidation squad. You know, the kind of stuff we used to point at in other countries and call authoritarian.

This is the guy who ran the Jan. 6 investigation, the pipe bomb probe, counterterrorism, SWAT, hostage rescue — basically the sort of résumé you’d want in government if you weren’t trying to turn it into a personal protection racket for Donald J. Trump. Now he’s trying to get into Congress to make it a co-equal branch of government again, which is a polite way of saying: maybe the legislature should stop acting like Trump’s HOA board and start acting like it read Article I.

Meanwhile, the race to replace Steny Hoyer features a retiring party leader’s chosen successor, a former Capitol Police officer who faced the mob Trump unleashed, and now the FBI official Trump fired after he investigated that same mob. The 5th District ballot is starting to look less like a primary and more like a support group for people who’ve personally experienced what happens when you let an aspiring autocrat treat federal power like a family business.

The CIA has announced it will retract or heavily edit 19 intelligence reports after a review by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board — a body now stacked with Trump loyalists like Devin Nunes, Reince Priebus, Brad Wenstrup, and Katie Miller (yes, the Stephen Miller one). CIA Director and Trump appointee John Ratcliffe swears this is all about protecting the agency from bias, which is a bold claim from a crew that treats objective reality like a hostile foreign power.

The offending reports? Analyses on white supremacist women being radicalized, global contraceptive shortages harming economic development, and LGBT activists under pressure in the Middle East and North Africa. So the Trump-era standard for "tradecraft" appears to be: if it makes right-wing culture warriors uncomfortable, it clearly fails the analytic rigor test. The agency insists this purge is just about meeting "the President’s expectations" that the workforce remain independent of any agenda — by obeying his agenda.

Sen. Mark Warner politely called this what it is: politicization of intelligence. Sen. Tom Cotton, meanwhile, applauded the move, accusing Obama and Biden of mixing politics and intelligence, while cheering on a board of hyperpartisan Trump picks literally rewriting the historical record. The intelligence community is supposedly being rescued from bias by the same people who think climate change is a hoax and that the deep state lives under their bed. What could possibly go wrong when national security analysis is run through a MAGA vibes-check?