The Trump Presidency Is Going Great

The Trump administration has apparently decided that if you can’t stop people from voting, you can at least lose their ballots in a software crash. The U.S. Postal Service, suddenly moonlighting as an arm of the voter suppression industry, has rushed together a new online portal to enforce Trump’s mail-voting order. States would be forced to feed voter data into this black box so USPS can "verify" batches of absentee ballots before they’re mailed. One glitch, one smudged barcode, one scanner hiccup, and the entire batch gets bounced back like a rejected coupon.

A whistleblower says the system was slapped together in weeks, barely tested, and has already crashed in testing — perfect qualifications for becoming a critical national election bottleneck. A federal judge has temporarily blocked USPS from forcing states to use this portal, but the Postal Service is appealing, because why deliver ballots when you can police them? Lawsuits point out that USPS has no legal authority to run voter verification, but the administration insists it’s all about "security" — the same way putting a padlock on the polling place and throwing away the key is about "line management."

Whistleblower attorney David Kligerman notes the scheme demands a 0% failure rate — something not required in any other part of the mail system — which is a cute standard when the software is already falling over in tests. The actual effect is obvious: create enough red tape and technical landmines between states and voters that ballots arrive late, or never. It’s not election administration; it’s a denial-of-service attack on democracy, helpfully branded with a USPS logo.

President Trump has apparently just remembered that gas prices are a thing normal people pay, and with the midterms breathing down his neck, he’s now "pulling out all the stops" to look like he cares. Translation: expect a flurry of half-baked executive stunts, angry tweets at oil companies, and some performative yelling at the Federal Reserve, all while insisting everything was cheaper back when he was merely threatening coups instead of running the country again.

Instead of, say, a coherent energy policy or structural relief for people who can't afford groceries and rent, we get election-year panic cosplay masquerading as economic stewardship. The affordability crisis is real; the response is reality TV. Trump gets to posture as the great defender of the working class while doing what he always does best: treating the entire federal government like a campaign prop and hoping voters don’t notice the price at the pump is still doing better numbers than he is.

The Department of Justice spent a year and untold taxpayer dollars trying to kneecap California school sports over… fewer than ten trans student athletes. A federal judge has now ceremoniously drop-kicked the Trump administration’s lawsuit into the sun, ruling that you can’t just yell "executive order" and retroactively threaten to cut off funding because you’re mad about a handful of girls running track.

Judge Cynthia Valenzuela pointed out that the feds never actually gave California clear notice that its money was contingent on banning trans girls, and that the government’s own guidance on this has changed more often than Trump’s story under oath. Even the conservative supreme court’s recent ruling upholding anti-trans laws in West Virginia and Idaho couldn’t save Trump here, since it stopped short of mandating a national ban—minor detail the White House chose to ignore while it tried to cosplay as Title IX’s savior.

The DOJ, having just been told it can’t bully states into preemptively obeying Trump’s discriminatory whims, says it’s "evaluating our options for appeal" and reaffirmed its commitment to "preventing boys from playing in girls’ sports"—a phrase that helpfully erases the actual girls they’re targeting. Meanwhile, California keeps its decade-old inclusive policy, trans kids get to keep playing sports in peace for the moment, and the administration adds another entry to its already impressive record of using federal power to punch down at children and still managing to lose in court.

The Trump administration has discovered a bold new frontier in immigration enforcement: newborns. The State Department is proposing that parents who want a passport for their US-born kids must now prove their own citizenship or immigration status, turning a routine errand into a mini inquisition to prop up Trump’s latest attack on birthright citizenship. Because when the Supreme Court tells you your first attempt to gut the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional, the obvious response is to try again with more paperwork and a different excuse.

This scheme is the implementation manual for Trump’s August 6 executive order allegedly targeting “birth tourism,” but the fine print says the quiet part out loud: the government will comb through parents’ status to decide whether their American-born child actually counts as American. Kids with a parent tied to a foreign government, accused of fraud, or labeled an “alien enemy” can find their citizenship quietly downgraded to "pending regime approval." The State Department insists this is about “protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship,” which is a poetic way of saying: we'll decide which babies get rights.

Under the current system, parents just prove they’re the parents and show ID. Under Trump’s new reality show, everyone has to cough up passports, birth certificates, I‑94s, green cards, and whatever else the bureaucracy demands so the government can run a loyalty check on your family before your kid gets to travel. Civil rights lawyers are already in court trying to stop this sequel to the administration’s first, already-struck-down birthright citizenship order. Trump keeps losing at the Supreme Court, but the policy goal is clear: if they can’t rewrite the Constitution outright, they’ll just make it impossible for the wrong families’ kids to use it.

Donald Trump, now an 80-year-old president with the emotional range of a Reddit troll, spent his weekend posting AI duck memes and complaining about a lake, while 23-year-old Olivia Rodrigo accidentally wandered into the role of Leader of the Free World by raising $20 million for women-focused nonprofits that his administration helped gut. The Trump team slashed funding for reproductive health and women’s legal groups, so a pop festival is now doing the basic governance work the federal government used to pretend to care about.

Meanwhile, US institutions are lining up to kiss the ring. Universities are defunding DEI, major media outlets are treating Trump like a temperamental monarch to protect their deals, and tech CEOs have happily curled up in bed with him, algorithmically tucking in authoritarianism every night. Against that backdrop, Rodrigo is openly calling out Roe’s overturning, telling the Trump administration not to use her music in its "racist, hateful propaganda" video demanding undocumented immigrants self-deport, and quietly showing solidarity with Gaza via her platform and even her wardrobe. You know things are going well when basic empathy is now a high-risk career move.

On the other side of the courage spectrum, Taylor Swift — the self-professed "right side of history" billionaire — has gone mostly ghost during Trump 2.0. Her songs were used in White House ragebait posts for months, then quietly removed with no public pushback from the world’s most powerful woman in sequins. No comment on Gaza, no comment on ICE, just a carefully curated silence while free speech, women’s rights, and civil liberties get put through a woodchipper. The message from Trump’s America is clear: the government will bully, defund, and intimidate; the oligarchs will cash in; and if you want anyone to stand up for the vulnerable, you’d better hope a 23-year-old pop star has enough backbone to cover the gap where institutions used to be.