trump asks scotus to help the post office stop delivering democracy

An election worker processes mail-in ballots, blissfully unaware that the president would prefer the envelopes be barcoded, tracked, and maybe not delivered if the data doesn’t look sufficiently pro-Trump.
The Trump administration is now openly asking the Supreme Court to bless its plan to turn the U.S. Postal Service into a voter-suppression franchise. After a federal judge in Boston slapped a temporary restraining order on the scheme, Trump’s lawyers sprinted to SCOTUS, begging the justices to let USPS refuse to deliver ballots from states that don’t hand over detailed voter lists and slap special barcodes on envelopes. Because when you can’t win voters, you can always try to lose their ballots.
For the moment, the judge’s order means mail voting for the midterms is supposed to function normally, which is adorable given that USPS has apparently cobbled together an untested online portal to vacuum up voter data and a verification process that a whistleblower says could prevent people from getting ballots on time—or at all. Trump claims this is all to stop hordes of noncitizens from voting, a problem that studies show is rarer than a Trump staffer with job security. The challengers call it illegal election meddling; the administration calls it "regulating mail." Tomato, fascist tomato.
Election experts say it’s too late to jam this half-baked surveillance-and-rejection system into a live election without chaos, which is of course the selling point. North Carolina starts mailing absentee ballots basically now, while the White House is trying to rewrite the rules of the game mid-deal and have the Supreme Court cut the brake lines. It’s not subtle: the president is trying to weaponize the post office to decide which Americans are allowed to vote, and he’d like the highest court in the land to co-sign the sabotage.


















