securities lawyer to secure the nation, what could go wrong

Jay Clayton, looking like he’s about to explain that national security is really just a disclosure issue for the markets.
Trump has decided that the best person to run America’s national security apparatus is Jay Clayton — yes, the corporate lawyer / former SEC chair whose main experience with "threats" involves hostile takeovers and securities fraud. The Senate Intelligence Committee now gets to pretend this is a normal nomination and not an attempt to turn national security into yet another Trump-branded legal defense team with security clearances.
Instead of a career intelligence professional, the White House is pushing a guy whose primary qualification appears to be knowing which oligarchs have which shell companies. In a functioning democracy, that might raise questions about conflicts of interest, capture of the security state by corporate power, and whether the director of national security should maybe know something about, say, national security. In Trump’s America, it’s just Tuesday.
The hearing will feature solemn speeches about "bipartisanship" and "the gravity of the role" from the same senators who rubber-stamped turning DHS into a campaign prop and CIA into a revenge fantasy factory. If history is any guide, they’ll clutch some pearls, ask a few sternly worded questions for B-roll, then hand the keys to the intel community to a man whose career goal has been keeping powerful people out of jail, not protecting the country from them.













