The Trump Presidency Timeline

Media outlets briefly got excited that Joe Rogan might have grown a conscience after he compared ICE to the Gestapo over the killing of Renee Nicole Good. Unfortunately, context is a buzzkill: in the full three-hour episode with Rand Paul, Rogan calls the shooting "unfortunate" but suggests Good "seemed crazy" and might have been an agitator, sympathizes with ICE, and frames their anonymous, unaccountable operations as a regrettable-but-necessary response to mass Democratic "fraud" in Minnesota. So yes, he said "Gestapo" — but mostly to complain that the secret police are being misunderstood.

The article tracks how Rogan has been a very on-message repeater for Trumpworld’s favorite lie: that Democrats are flooding the country with "illegals" to "hijack" democracy and build a permanent one-party state. From JD Vance warning about Democrats "taking away congressional representation" from citizens, to Elon Musk spinning a plot to create a permanent socialist regime, to Stephen Miller and the Trump White House demanding undocumented people be stripped from the census, Rogan keeps dutifully echoing the script to his giant audience. He’s now regularly telling guests that 10 million undocumented immigrants were "let in" as a built-in voter base to rig elections — which happens to line up perfectly with the classic far-right "great replacement" conspiracy theory he’s supposedly just innocently "asking questions" about.

Meanwhile, the actual census data show red states gaining seats at the expense of blue ones, but why let reality interfere when the Trump administration is busy trying to redefine the electorate and Rogan is there to provide the vibes-based infomercial? The administration pushes to erase undocumented immigrants from representation, Miller screams about "tens of millions of illegals" stealing House seats, and the world’s biggest podcaster turns it into casual background noise between elk meat and DMT stories. If this is what counts as Trump losing a high-profile supporter, the regime’s propaganda machine is doing just fine.

The Trump administration heard the public outcry over ripping kids from their parents at the border and, in a bold new innovation in cruelty, decided the fix was to just lock them up together. Welcome back to Dilley, Texas, a family detention center so humane it features a measles outbreak, reports of no clean drinking water, and a five-year-old asylum seeker in a Spider-Man backpack becoming the country’s newest symbol of state-sponsored child abuse. Since Trump returned to office, the daily number of kids in ICE detention has jumped sixfold, because nothing says "family values" like expanding the baby prison sector.

Local organizers and faith groups are literally standing outside the fence screaming so the kids inside know they’re not forgotten, while CoreCivic – the private prison company cashing the checks – assures us that everything is fine and the health and safety of detainees is their "top priority." Fun fact: their top priority also appears on the NYSE. ICE, naturally, declined to comment, presumably too busy planning how to spend the $38bn DHS wants to blow on buying warehouses and converting them into even more detention centers. Why invest in schools when you can build climate-controlled trauma factories?

Meanwhile, a growing national coalition is pointing out that all of this horror is perfectly legal because Congress hasn’t bothered to outlaw jailing entire families. Advocates call it what it is – "state-sponsored child abuse" – while public opinion finally starts to notice that maybe ICE has "gone too far" when it’s arresting kindergartners in bunny hats. A few states like New Mexico and Illinois are trying to slam the door on ICE detention and private lockups, and local developers are backing out of detention deals under public pressure. The administration’s response so far: double down on the warehouse gulag strategy and hope Americans get bored of watching children beg for "libertad" from behind barbed wire.

The Trump administration’s war on international students has found a very eager foot soldier in Indiana, where Purdue University is reportedly pioneering a new admissions standard: citizenship-based auto-reject. After getting a sternly worded letter from the House’s Select Committee on the CCP — which basically accused Chinese students of being walking national security breaches — Purdue departments started admitting Chinese grad students, offering them funding, watching them turn down other schools and sign leases, and then having the university swoop in weeks later to quietly yank the offers with all the transparency of a CIA black site.

Faculty, students, and alumni say there’s now an unwritten policy to block applicants from China and other officially designated "adversary nations" — Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea — because nothing says "meritocracy" like a secret list of forbidden passports. Purdue, for its part, insists there is "no ban", it’s just coincidentally rescinding offers to Chinese students after departments admit them, and also refusing to explain why. Totally normal behavior for a public university that allegedly believes in academic freedom.

This isn’t happening in a vacuum. Trump already canceled thousands of student visas (a lot of them Chinese), froze billions in research funding, and helped drive international enrollments off a cliff, while overseas universities cheerfully scoop up the talent we’re busy deporting or ghosting. Other schools like UIUC are at least doing their xenophobic compliance cosplay in writing by "winding down" partnerships with Chinese institutions. Purdue, though, seems to be test-driving the next phase: a soft ban that’s invisible on paper, brutal in practice, and perfectly aligned with an administration that treats foreign students as spies until proven otherwise — and then still denies them housing.

Minnesota just got a front-row seat to the Trump administration’s favorite pastime: militarized immigration theater. After Trump’s so-called Operation Metro Surge dumped more than 3,000 immigration officers into Minneapolis, ICE managed to do what it does best — kill two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti — and then spark weeks of protests while the White House congratulated itself for being “tough.”

The result? Minnesotans are now even more polarized than the rest of the country on immigration, because it turns out watching armed federal agents roam your streets and shoot citizens tends to clarify your views. Democrats and independents in the state overwhelmingly think ICE has gone too far and want it reformed or abolished. Republicans, especially outside the Twin Cities, are more supportive of Trump’s ICE than Republicans nationwide — because nothing says law and order like backing the guys who just shot two Americans.

Curiously, Republicans in Minneapolis and St. Paul — you know, the ones who actually had to live near the raids, protests, and gunfire — are several times more likely to say ICE and Border Patrol tactics went too far. It’s amazing what seeing federal power up close does to your “back the blue no matter what” energy. Meanwhile, independents are split between supporting Trump more than their national peers and blaming his administration for the clashes in the streets. The administration has essentially run a human-subjects experiment in authoritarian policing and discovered that, yes, deploying an occupying force into a U.S. city radicalizes people. Who could have guessed.

Trump’s Department of Homeland Security looked at Maine — a state with labor shortages, aging demographics, and communities that actually want immigrants — and said: what if we sent masked, heavily armed agents into its most diverse cities and called it Operation Catch of the Day? Because when you’re doing a legally and morally grotesque dragnet, you might as well slap a dad joke on it. Officially, DHS swore they were going after “the worst of the worst.” In reality, videos and eyewitnesses show them sweeping up a Colombian civil engineer with a work permit, asylum-seekers legally working at county jails, and shattering a car window so a one-month-old baby could be showered in glass while they grabbed his father, who has no criminal record.

All of this just happens to kick off weeks before vulnerable Republican Sen. Susan Collins — the eternal queen of being "concerned" right before voting for it — is up for reelection in a state that didn’t vote for Trump. Now the immigration crackdown is the defining issue in the race, with terrified immigrant communities on one side and a White House happy to turn federal law enforcement into campaign muscle on the other. The message from Trump’s America is clear: no matter how legal your status, how essential your job, or how tiny your baby, you’re one convenient photo-op away from becoming collateral damage in the reelection strategy.

So Maine gets militarized ICE raids, broken windows, and traumatized families, while Collins gets to pretend she’s just an innocent bystander to the administration she keeps enabling. DHS calls it enforcement. The campaign calls it a wedge issue. Anyone with a conscience would call it what it is: state-sponsored harassment of immigrants, dressed up as public safety and served with a side of lobster-themed branding.

The Trump administration’s deportation machine has now graduated from caging children to psychologically and physically tormenting a 42-year-old Irish plasterer with a valid work permit whose biggest crime is buying supplies at a hardware store. Seamus Culleton, who overstayed a visa years ago but is now married to a U.S. citizen and on the path to a green card, has been locked in an El Paso ICE facility for five months, jammed into a filthy room with 71 other detainees, barely fed, and given almost no access to fresh air or exercise. He describes the conditions as “torture” and says he fears the staff, not the other detainees. America First apparently means Geneva Conventions Last.

In a particularly on-brand twist, ICE snatched him before his final green card interview—the one that would have confirmed his legal status. His lawyer calls his detention “inexplicable,” which is generous; it’s perfectly explicable if the goal is to demonstrate that in Trump’s America, the process is the punishment and paperwork is just a prop. While Culleton begs the Irish government and taoiseach Micheál Martin to get him out before he’s deported by the “least immigrant-friendly” appeals court in the country, Dublin is busy trying not to upset the guy in the White House who already rants about Ireland’s taxes, trade, and immigration.

Meanwhile, data quietly shows that fewer than 14% of the nearly 400,000 immigrants ICE arrested in year one of Trump’s second term had violent charges or convictions, which somewhat undermines the whole “we’re only going after the worst of the worst” bedtime story. Even Trump’s own “border czar” Tom Homan reportedly warned that this kind of dragnet enforcement would erode public support. The administration heard that and seems to have responded: challenge accepted. Why limit yourself to demonizing brown migrants when you can terrorize a white Irish small business owner too and prove that no one is safe from the rage of a government that treats due process like an optional add-on?

The Trump administration has located the gravest threat to the republic, and it is a five-year-old Ecuadorian boy in a bunny hat. After a judge ordered Liam Conejo Ramos and his father released from a notorious Texas family detention facility, Department of Homeland Security lawyers are now trying to deport them anyway, helpfully demonstrating that in Trump’s America, a court order is more of a suggestion than a constraint.

DHS insists this is all just "standard procedure" and totally not retaliatory, as they move to end the family’s asylum claims and push removal proceedings against people who entered legally as asylum applicants. Representative Joaquin Castro, who helped escort Liam home to Minnesota after the child spent ten days in a trailer prison getting sick and terrified of guards, says the administration is "trying to take him again" and breaking precedent to do it. So yes, the government that can’t manage basic governance is extremely efficient at hunting down kindergarteners.

This is not a one-off horror story; it’s the business model. ICE booked about 3,800 minors into family detention from January to October 2025, including toddlers, with more than 2,600 kids grabbed inside the country, far from any border. The message from Trump’s DHS is clear: if you legally seek asylum, we might lock your children in a trailer, ignore judges, and try to deport you anyway — all while insisting, with a straight face, that there’s "nothing retaliatory" about it. Bold strategy to make "we terrorize little kids" the core brand of federal law enforcement.